# Accuracy issues with provided weaviate Rerankers

**URL:** https://forum.weaviate.io/t/accuracy-issues-with-provided-weaviate-rerankers/22036
**Category:** Support
**Tags:** python, technical
**Created:** [October 14, 2025, 7:24am UTC](https://forum.weaviate.io/t/accuracy-issues-with-provided-weaviate-rerankers/22036 "2025-10-14T07:24:33Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Dev\_Choudhary](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.weaviate.io/dev_choudhary/32/7635_2.png) [@Dev\_Choudhary](https://forum.weaviate.io/u/Dev_Choudhary)
#### Post date: [October 14, 2025, 7:24am UTC](https://forum.weaviate.io/t/accuracy-issues-with-provided-weaviate-rerankers/22036/1 "2025-10-14T07:24:33Z")

</div>

I am facing issue with weaviate reranker as it is not providing accurate ranking to my retrieved document. i am using [cr.weaviate.io/semitechnologies/reranker-transformers:cross-encoder-ms-marco-MiniLM-L-6-v2](http://cr.weaviate.io/semitechnologies/reranker-transformers:cross-encoder-ms-marco-MiniLM-L-6-v2) with weaviate:1.30.0. The rank orders have issues.

I see the need to implement more sophisticated rerankers, but they seem to take a lot of time. Is there a way to use more mature rerankers which can be as fast as the current one being used?

Also how can I integrate other rerankers with the given reranker module?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![DudaNogueira](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.weaviate.io/dudanogueira/32/7846_2.png) [@DudaNogueira](https://forum.weaviate.io/u/DudaNogueira)
#### Post date: [October 14, 2025, 1:34pm UTC](https://forum.weaviate.io/t/accuracy-issues-with-provided-weaviate-rerankers/22036/2 "2025-10-14T13:34:40Z")

</div>

Hi!

Were you able to use the reranker alone?

Also, can you provide an example we could reproduce?

thanks!