# Rank search by recency

**URL:** <https://forum.weaviate.io/t/rank-search-by-recency/2308>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [May 14, 2024, 5:09am UTC](https://forum.weaviate.io/t/rank-search-by-recency/2308 "2024-05-14T05:09:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DudaNogueira](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.weaviate.io/dudanogueira/32/7846_2.png) [@DudaNogueira](https://forum.weaviate.io/u/DudaNogueira)\
**Post date:** [May 17, 2024, 7:48pm UTC](https://forum.weaviate.io/t/rank-search-by-recency/2308/4 "2024-05-17T19:48:58Z")

</div>

Nice.

I believe this is somehow related to this thread:

> [@How to manage the merging of an hybrid query on a property and a BM25 on another](https://forum.weaviate.io/t/how-to-manage-the-merging-of-an-hybrid-query-on-a-property-and-a-bm25-on-another/2326):
>
> I have a collection whose declaration is the following (simplified): client.collections.create( name=wv\_artcollname, description="A collection of articles data", vectorizer\_config=vect\_config\_list, properties=[ wvcc.Property(name="prose", data\_type=wvcc.DataType.TEXT), wvcc.Property( name="entities", data\_type=wvcc.DataType.TEXT, …

On that thread the idea is to apply a bm25 after to reinforce some properties, but that “intentional bias” could also be extended to other late reinforcement other than a bm25, like in your case, taking into account a datetime property.

This is a good feature request. Do you mind opening one in our GH so we can keep track in our [roadmap](https://weaviate.io/developers/weaviate/roadmap)?

> **[Build software better, together](https://github.com/weaviate/weaviate/issues/new/choose)**
>
> GitHub is where people build software. More than 100 million people use GitHub to discover, fork, and contribute to over 420 million projects.

Thanks!

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.weaviate.io/t/rank-search-by-recency/2308)._